Radeon RX 640 vs HD 7540D IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.97
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameScrapperPolaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192640
Core clock speed760 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate9.12048.72
Floating-point processing power0.2918 TFLOPS1.559 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1240
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

RX 640 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7540D IGP and Radeon RX 640. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7540D IGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 640 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
Radeon HD 7540D IGP
AMD Radeon RX 640
Radeon RX 640

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7540D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 278 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7540D IGP or Radeon RX 640, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.