Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs HD 7540D IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.81
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameScrapperVega 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921024
Core clock speed760 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate9.12076.16
Floating-point processing power0.2918 TFLOPS2.437 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1264
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared1024 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data307.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 14 November 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

HD 7540D IGP has 15% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 16, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 129% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7540D IGP and Radeon Pro Vega 16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7540D IGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 88 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7540D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7540D IGP or Radeon Pro Vega 16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.