GeForce GT 530 OEM vs Radeon HD 7520G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1140not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.63no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameScrapperGF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)14 May 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19296
Core clock speed496 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed685 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate8.22011.20
Floating-point processing power0.263 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 14 May 2011
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

HD 7520G has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7520G and GeForce GT 530 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7520G is a notebook card while GeForce GT 530 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7520G
Radeon HD 7520G
NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
GeForce GT 530 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 94 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 196 votes

Rate GeForce GT 530 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.