Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs HD 7510 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTurksVega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2013 (12 years ago)3 December 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203584
Core clock speed650 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors716 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)39 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate10.40336.0
Floating-point processing power0.416 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs16224
L1 Cache32 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length165 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed667 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.34 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA6x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2013 3 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 39 Watt 230 Watt

HD 7510 OEM has 489.7% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7510 OEM and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7510 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7510 OEM
Radeon HD 7510 OEM
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7510 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7510 OEM or Radeon Pro WX 8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.