GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs Radeon HD 7500G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1207not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.32no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteG92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)21 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$160

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256128
Core clock speed327 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate6.78446.40
Floating-point processing power0.2171 TFLOPS0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1664
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 21 July 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 125 Watt

HD 7500G has an age advantage of 3 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 635.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7500G and GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7500G is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7500G
Radeon HD 7500G
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 71 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7500G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7500G or GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.