GeForce 805A vs Radeon HD 7500G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1210not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.40no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteGK208
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)22 July 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256192
Core clock speed327 MHz719 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHz758 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.78412.13
Floating-point processing power0.2171 TFLOPS0.2911 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1001 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16.02 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 22 July 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce 805A has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7500G and GeForce 805A. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7500G
Radeon HD 7500G
NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GeForce 805A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 71 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7500G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7500G or GeForce 805A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.