ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs Radeon HD 7500G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1216not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.44no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 2 (1997)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteRage IIC
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 April 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed327 MHz60 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million5 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Wattno data
Texture fill rate6.7840.06
Floating-point processing power0.2171 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs161

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared83 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data664.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)5.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 1 April 1997
Chip lithography 32 nm 500 nm

HD 7500G has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7500G and 3D Rage IIC PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7500G is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage IIC PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7500G
Radeon HD 7500G
ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI
3D Rage IIC PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 72 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7500G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage IIC PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7500G or 3D Rage IIC PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.