Arctic Sound-M vs Radeon HD 7490M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameSeymourArctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2012 (14 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1608192
Core clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors370 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400230.4
Floating-point processing power0.256 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth30.4 GB/s1.23 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 500 Watt

HD 7490M has 5455.6% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7490M and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7490M is a notebook graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7490M
Radeon HD 7490M
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7490M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7490M or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.