Tesla M1060 vs Radeon HD 7480D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1232not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.79no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteGT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53 $1,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128240
Core clock speed723 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate6.40048.80
Floating-point processing power0.2048 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 188 Watt

HD 7480D has an age advantage of 4 years, a 71.9% more advanced lithography process, and 189.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7480D and Tesla M1060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7480D is a desktop graphics card while Tesla M1060 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Radeon HD 7480D
NVIDIA Tesla M1060
Tesla M1060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 274 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7480D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Tesla M1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7480D or Tesla M1060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.