Radeon Sky 900 vs HD 7480D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1239not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.79no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteTahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)27 March 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1283584 ×2
Core clock speed723 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.2048 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs8112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data480 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 27 March 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 300 Watt

HD 7480D has 361.5% lower power consumption.

Sky 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7480D and Radeon Sky 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7480D is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Sky 900 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Radeon HD 7480D
AMD Radeon Sky 900
Radeon Sky 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 278 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7480D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7480D or Radeon Sky 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.