Radeon Pro W5300M vs HD 7480D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1241not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.79no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteNavi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)13 November 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281280
Core clock speed723 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400100.0
Floating-point processing power0.2048 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 13 November 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 85 Watt

HD 7480D has 31% lower power consumption.

Pro W5300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7480D and Radeon Pro W5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7480D is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 283 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7480D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro W5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7480D or Radeon Pro W5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.