GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB vs Radeon HD 7480D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1233not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.80no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteGM204
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)9 January 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281024
Core clock speed723 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate6.40073.60
Floating-point processing power0.2048 TFLOPS2.355 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 9 January 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

GTX 965M 4 GB has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7480D and GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7480D is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Radeon HD 7480D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB
GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 274 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7480D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7480D or GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.