Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Radeon HD 7450M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1129not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.39no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameSeymourTiger Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (12 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160384
Core clock speed700 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors370 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.60026.40
Floating-point processing power0.224 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs412
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

HD 7450M has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics G4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7450M and Iris Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7450M is a notebook card while Iris Xe Graphics G4 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Radeon HD 7450M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Iris Xe Graphics G4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 52 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 209 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.