Quadro4 500 XGL vs Radeon HD 7420G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1210not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.65no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteNV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)19 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed480 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed655 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.2401.000
Floating-point processing power0.1677 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 19 February 2002
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm

HD 7420G has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7420G and Quadro4 500 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7420G is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 500 XGL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Radeon HD 7420G
NVIDIA Quadro4 500 XGL
Quadro4 500 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7420G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 500 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7420G or Quadro4 500 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.