ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs HD 7420G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1210not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.65no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteM96
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)5 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128320
Core clock speed480 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed655 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate5.24021.60
Floating-point processing power0.1677 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 5 May 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 20 Watt

HD 7420G has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 71.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 565v, on the other hand, has 75% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7420G and Mobility Radeon HD 565v. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Radeon HD 7420G
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Mobility Radeon HD 565v

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7420G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 565v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7420G or Mobility Radeon HD 565v, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.