GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs Radeon HD 7420G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1210not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.64no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)25 August 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281344
Core clock speed480 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed655 MHz980 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate5.240109.8
Floating-point processing power0.1677 TFLOPS2.634 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8112
L1 Cacheno data112 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 25 August 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 170 Watt

HD 7420G has 385.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7420G and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7420G is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Radeon HD 7420G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7420G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 21 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7420G or GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.