Radeon HD 8670 OEM vs HD 7400G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1236not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.84no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameScrapperOland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)8 January 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed327 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate5.08825.20
Floating-point processing power0.1628 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1224
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data73.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 8 January 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 75 Watt

HD 7400G has 341.2% lower power consumption.

HD 8670 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7400G and Radeon HD 8670 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7400G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 8670 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7400G
Radeon HD 7400G
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM
Radeon HD 8670 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 98 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7400G or Radeon HD 8670 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.