ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4 vs HD 7400G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1256not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.85no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameScrapperR300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed327 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.0882.600 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.1628 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48 ×4
TMUs128 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.84 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm

HD 7400G has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 369% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7400G and Radeon 9700 PRO X4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7400G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 107 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7400G or Radeon 9700 PRO X4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.