ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs HD 7400G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12561601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.85no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameScrapperRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed327 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate5.0880.8
Floating-point processing power0.1628 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7400G 265
+13150%
Samples: 65
ATI 9200 SE 2
Samples: 78

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 3−4 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 28 Watt

HD 7400G has an age advantage of 9 years, a 369% more advanced lithography process, and 65% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7400G and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7400G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 107 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7400G or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.