GeForce GTX 480 512 vs Radeon HD 7400G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1243not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.89no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameScrapperGF100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed327 MHz527 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate5.08833.73
Floating-point processing power0.1628 TFLOPSno data
ROPs448
TMUs1264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data292 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1536 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data134.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 375 Watt

HD 7400G has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 2105.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7400G and GeForce GTX 480 Core 512. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7400G is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7400G
Radeon HD 7400G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 98 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7400G or GeForce GTX 480 Core 512, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.