ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory vs HD 7340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1328not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.58no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameLovelandRV370
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)25 October 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$552.69 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed523 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHzno data
Number of transistors450 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1841.300
Floating-point processing power0.08368 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 25 October 2006
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 30 Watt

HD 7340 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 175% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7340 and Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7340
Radeon HD 7340
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7340 or Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.