RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon HD 7340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1338not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.58no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLovelandAD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$552.69 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores803072
Core clock speed523 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHz2010 MHz
Number of transistors450 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.184193.0
Floating-point processing power0.08368 TFLOPS12.35 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs896
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 50 Watt

HD 7340 has 178% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7340 and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7340 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7340 or RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.