ATI FireGL V7300 vs Radeon HD 7340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1338not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.58no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameLovelandR520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$552.69 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed523 MHz594 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHzno data
Number of transistors450 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt97 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1849.504
Floating-point processing power0.08368 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared648 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data41.47 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 1 October 2005
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 97 Watt

HD 7340 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 439% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7340 and FireGL V7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7340 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7300 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7340 or FireGL V7300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.