Radeon RX Vega 3 vs HD 7330M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated847
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Power efficiencyno data14.08
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRobsonPicasso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)6 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80192
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1001 MHz
Number of transistors292 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00012.01
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs812
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt

HD 7330M has 200% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7330M and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7330M
Radeon HD 7330M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2238 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7330M or Radeon RX Vega 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.