GeForce 9800S vs Radeon HD 7310

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.30no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameLovelandG94
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)15 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8064
Core clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors450 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00019.20
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 15 July 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 75 Watt

HD 7310 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7310 and GeForce 9800S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7310 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9800S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7310
Radeon HD 7310
NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
GeForce 9800S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 179 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7310 or GeForce 9800S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.