GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 7310

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1386not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.32no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameLovelandG98
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)4 December 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores808
Core clock speed500 MHz567 MHz
Number of transistors450 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0004.536
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.0224 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 4 December 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 25 Watt

HD 7310 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7310 and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7310
Radeon HD 7310
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 184 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 9 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7310 or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.