FirePro A320 vs Radeon HD 7310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1387not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.33no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameLovelandTrinity GL
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80384
Core clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data955 MHz
Number of transistors450 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00022.92
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.7334 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 100 Watt

HD 7310 has 456% lower power consumption.

FirePro A320, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7310 and FirePro A320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7310 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro A320 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 188 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7310 or FirePro A320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.