A100 PCIe 40 GB vs Radeon HD 7310

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.32no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameLovelandGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)22 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores806912
Core clock speed500 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors450 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000609.1
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs8432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared40 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,555 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 22 June 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 250 Watt

HD 7310 has 1288.9% lower power consumption.

A100 PCIe 40 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7310 and A100 PCIe 40 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7310 is a desktop graphics card while A100 PCIe 40 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7310
Radeon HD 7310
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB
A100 PCIe 40 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 179 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 12 votes

Rate A100 PCIe 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7310 or A100 PCIe 40 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.