Radeon RX 5800 XT vs HD 7290

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1419not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameLovelandNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores803328
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed400 MHz1775 MHz
Number of transistors450 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200369.2
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPS11.81 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 275 Watt

HD 7290 has 1428% lower power consumption.

RX 5800 XT, on the other hand, has a 471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon RX 5800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7290 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5800 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 269 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7290 or Radeon RX 5800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.