ATI Graphics Ultra Pro vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking520not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameBlackcomb XTXMach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 July 2011 (14 years ago)1 January 1993 (33 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2240no data
Core clock speed715 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors2x1700 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm800 nm
ROPsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataVLB
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5VRAM
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11None
OpenGLno dataNone
OpenCLno dataNone

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 July 2011 1 January 1993
Chip lithography 40 nm 800 nm

HD 6990M Crossfire has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire and Graphics Ultra Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire or Graphics Ultra Pro, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.