ATI Radeon 9000 LE vs HD 6950M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking719not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.96no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameBlackcombRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed580 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate27.841.000
Floating-point processing power1.114 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs484

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 28 Watt

HD 6950M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 LE, on the other hand, has 78.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6950M and Radeon 9000 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6950M is a notebook card while Radeon 9000 LE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6950M
Radeon HD 6950M
ATI Radeon 9000 LE
Radeon 9000 LE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9000 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.