ATI FirePro V9800 vs Radeon HD 6950M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking770not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.02no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameBlackcombCypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)9 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9601600
Core clock speed580 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate27.8468.00
Floating-point processing power1.114 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s147.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 9 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt

HD 6950M has an age advantage of 3 months, and 400% lower power consumption.

ATI V9800, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6950M and FirePro V9800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6950M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V9800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6950M
Radeon HD 6950M
ATI FirePro V9800
FirePro V9800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6950M or FirePro V9800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.