ATI Radeon X1550 PCI vs HD 6950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking630not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.96no data
Power efficiency2.39no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameCaymanRV516
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (15 years ago)2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speedno data452 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,640 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate70.401.808
Floating-point processing power2.253 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs884
L1 Cache352 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz532 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data4.256 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 119.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 27 Watt

HD 6950 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1550 PCI, on the other hand, has 1752% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6950 and Radeon X1550 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 244 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 13 votes

Rate Radeon X1550 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6950 or Radeon X1550 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.