HD Graphics 3000 vs Radeon HD 6775G2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameno dataSandy Bridge GT2+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)1 February 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores88096
Core clock speedno data650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,160 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no dataunknown
Texture fill rateno data15.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2496 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm

HD 6775G2 has an age advantage of 4 months.

HD Graphics 3000, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6775G2 and HD Graphics 3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6775G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 2943 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6775G2 or HD Graphics 3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.