ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs HD 6770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9031605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.08no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameWhistlerRS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (15 years ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802
Core clock speed725 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speedno data180 MHz
Number of transistors716 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.400.37
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs242
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6770M 964
+48100%
Samples: 10
ATI IGP 340M 2
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23no data
Full HD25no data
1200p12no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 2−3 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Fortnite 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Valorant 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Fortnite 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Valorant 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Valorant 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data
Valorant 18−20 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 10−12 0−1

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 6770M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 6770M surpassed ATI IGP 340M in all 19 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

HD 6770M has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6770M and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Radeon HD 6770M
ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6770M or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.