AMD HD 6750M vs ATI Mobility HD 4850

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

ATI Mobility HD 4850
1.63

HD 6750M outperforms Mobility HD 4850 by 48% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking900798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.150.14
ArchitectureTerascale 1 (2008−2010)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameM98Whistler-PRO
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years old)4 January 2011 (13 years old)
Current price$187 $506
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI Mobility HD 4850 has 7% better value for money than HD 6750M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800480
Core clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors956 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate20.0014.40
Floating-point performance800.0 gflops576.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon HD 6750M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 4850 1.63
HD 6750M 2.42
+48.5%

HD 6750M outperforms Mobility HD 4850 by 48% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI Mobility HD 4850 5264
HD 6750M 5483
+4.2%

HD 6750M outperforms Mobility HD 4850 by 4% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14−16
−50%
21
+50%
Full HD41
+64%
25
−64%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 0−1 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4850 and HD 6750M compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • HD 6750M is 50% faster than ATI Mobility HD 4850

1080p resolution:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4850 is 64% faster than HD 6750M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 6750M is 300% faster than the ATI Mobility HD 4850.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6750M is ahead in 32 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (16%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.63 2.42
Recency 9 January 2009 4 January 2011
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm

The Radeon HD 6750M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Mobility Radeon HD 4850
AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Radeon HD 6750M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 48 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 6750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.