AMD Radeon HD 6750M vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GeForce 920M
1.87

Radeon HD 6750M outperforms GeForce 920M by 29% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking867798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.040.14
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN16V-GM-SWhistler-PRO
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 January 2015 (9 years old)4 January 2011 (13 years old)
Current price$895 $506
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6750M has 250% better value for money than GeForce 920M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384480
Core clock speed954 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors915 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate30.5314.40
Floating-point performance297.6 gflops576.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 920M and Radeon HD 6750M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-A (3.0)

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+no data
GameWorks+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 920M 1.87
HD 6750M 2.42
+29.4%

Radeon HD 6750M outperforms GeForce 920M by 29% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 920M 723
HD 6750M 937
+29.6%

Radeon HD 6750M outperforms GeForce 920M by 30% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 920M 5587
+1.9%
HD 6750M 5483

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon HD 6750M by 2% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 920M 1719
+48.3%
HD 6750M 1159

GeForce 920M outperforms Radeon HD 6750M by 48% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p16−18
−31.3%
21
+31.3%
Full HD16
−56.3%
25
+56.3%
4K9
−11.1%
10−12
+11.1%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Hitman 3 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
Hitman 3 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Metro Exodus 2
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how GeForce 920M and HD 6750M compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • HD 6750M is 31.3% faster than GeForce 920M

1080p resolution:

  • HD 6750M is 56.3% faster than GeForce 920M

4K resolution:

  • HD 6750M is 11.1% faster than GeForce 920M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 920M is 167% faster than the HD 6750M.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 6750M is 200% faster than the GeForce 920M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 920M is ahead in 3 tests (7%)
  • HD 6750M is ahead in 31 test (72%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (21%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.87 2.42
Recency 27 January 2015 4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 35 Watt

The Radeon HD 6750M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M
AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Radeon HD 6750M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1117 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 48 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 6750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.