HD Graphics 12EU vs Radeon HD 6750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking879not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.22no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameJuniperIronlake
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date21 January 2011 (15 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72096
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,040 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate25.206.396
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPS0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs3612
L1 Cache72 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16QPI
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1050 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1110.1
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2011 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 40 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 35 Watt

HD 6750 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 12EU, on the other hand, has 146% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6750 and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 302 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 20 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6750 or HD Graphics 12EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.