Tesla X2090 vs Radeon HD 6670A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTurksGF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date19 April 2011 (14 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480512
Core clock speed600 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors716 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4041.66
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2464
L1 Cache48 KB1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2011 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 225 Watt

HD 6670A has 400% lower power consumption.

Tesla X2090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6670A and Tesla X2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6670A is a notebook graphics card while Tesla X2090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6670A
Radeon HD 6670A
NVIDIA Tesla X2090
Tesla X2090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6670A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 14 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6670A or Tesla X2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.