AeroBox GPU vs Radeon HD 6630M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameWhistlerKryptos
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (15 years ago)13 March 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480896
Core clock speed500 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speedno data985 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0055.16
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s68.22 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 13 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 100 Watt

HD 6630M Mac Edition has 285% lower power consumption.

AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6630M Mac Edition and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6630M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 680 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6630M Mac Edition or AeroBox GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.