Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
1.90
+40.7%

Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 41% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking862972
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data0.04
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)
GPU code nameno dataHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 February 2012 (12 years old)5 June 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$90 $425
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores88020
Core clock speed400 / 600 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistorsno data392 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data22.00
Floating-point performanceno data46 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and HD Graphics 4400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno data64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 1.90
+40.7%
HD Graphics 4400 1.35

Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 41% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 5400
+50.7%
HD Graphics 4400 3583

Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 51% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 1600
+118%
HD Graphics 4400 736

Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 118% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 777
+36.6%
HD Graphics 4400 569

Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 37% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 9719
+96.2%
HD Graphics 4400 4953

Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 96% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%
Full HD26
+160%
10
−160%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and HD Graphics 4400 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 33.3% faster than HD Graphics 4400

1080p resolution:

  • HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 160% faster than HD Graphics 4400

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 200% faster than the HD Graphics 4400.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is ahead in 17 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (47%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.90 1.35
Recency 8 February 2012 5 June 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm

The Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 6620G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1164 votes

Rate Intel HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.