GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) vs Radeon HD 6610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking991not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameWhistlerNV11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 March 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4801
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data166 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80no data
Floating-point performance0.432 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 / 64 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)DDR
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 1 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 2 Watt

HD 6610M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

2 Go (200 / 100), on the other hand, has 1200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6610M and GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6610M is a desktop card while GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6610M
Radeon HD 6610M
NVIDIA GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 302 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.