Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 vs Radeon HD 6570M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1049not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.43no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameCapilanoCedar Trail
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 November 2010 (14 years ago)1 November 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4004
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data640 MHz
Number of transistors627 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs20no data
L1 Cache40 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2010 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6570M and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6570M
Radeon HD 6570M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 28 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6570M or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.