GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs Radeon HD 6550M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1064not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.69no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameLexingtonGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 November 2010 (14 years ago)25 August 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4001152
Core clock speed600 MHz823 MHz
Boost clock speedno data888 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0085.25
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS2.046 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2096
L1 Cache80 KB96 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s179.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2010 25 August 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 130 Watt

HD 6550M has 400% lower power consumption.

GTX 760 OEM Rebrand, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6550M and GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6550M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6550M
Radeon HD 6550M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6550M or GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.