UHD Graphics 630 Mobile vs Radeon HD 6550D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1164not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.13no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameSumoCoffee Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 June 2011 (14 years ago)3 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400192
Core clock speed600 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0024.00
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs83
TMUs2024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2011 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6550D and UHD Graphics 630 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6550D is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics 630 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Radeon HD 6550D
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 98 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6550D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 46 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6550D or UHD Graphics 630 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.