FirePro V7900 SDI vs Radeon HD 6550D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1091not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.11no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameSumoCayman
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 June 2011 (13 years ago)24 May 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4001280
Core clock speed600 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt224 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0058.00
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 224 Watt

HD 6550D has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 244.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6550D and FirePro V7900 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6550D is a desktop card while FirePro V7900 SDI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Radeon HD 6550D
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 91 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6550D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro V7900 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.