Atari VCS 800 GPU vs Radeon HD 6550D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1163not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.13no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameSumoBanded Kestrel
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 June 2011 (14 years ago)14 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400192
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1201 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0014.41
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.4612 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs2012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Lengthno data295 mm
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2011 14 December 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Atari VCS 800 GPU has an age advantage of 9 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6550D and Atari VCS 800 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Radeon HD 6550D
AMD Atari VCS 800 GPU
Atari VCS 800 GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 98 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6550D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate Atari VCS 800 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6550D or Atari VCS 800 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.