ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs HD 6550A
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 991 | 1601 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.71 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Rage 7 (2001−2006) |
| GPU code name | Pinewood | RV280 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 February 2011 (15 years ago) | 1 March 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 627 million | 36 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 13.20 | 0.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.528 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 4 |
| TMUs | 24 | 4 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 8x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 166 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 2.656 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 8.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 February 2011 | 1 March 2003 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
HD 6550A has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.
ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6550A and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6550A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
