ATI Graphics Ultra + vs Radeon HD 6545G2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameno dataMach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)1 January 1992 (34 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speedno data10 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm800 nm
ROPsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDRAM
Maximum RAM amountno data1 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11None
OpenGLno dataNone
OpenCLno dataNone

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 1 January 1992
Chip lithography 40 nm 800 nm

HD 6545G2 has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6545G2 and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6545G2 is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6545G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6545G2 or Graphics Ultra +, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.