ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs HD 6540G2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11051596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameno dataRS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802
Core clock speedno data183 MHz
Boost clock speedno data180 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.37
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX117.0
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 6540G2 is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6540G2 performs better in 22 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

HD 6540G2 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6540G2 and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6540G2
Radeon HD 6540G2
ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6540G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6540G2 or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.